I touched on this a bit last week when I mentioned the multiple Banner Thomases in Pierce, later Appling, County. There are many reasons we run into conflicting evidence and all too often people overlook or ignore them and simply concentrate on the person they are confident is the right one.
But I ask, how many times have you seen people with trees online that simply do not make sense? I found one case where someone did not realize there were two men named Bolar Moon in the same county and between the two there were three marriages. But this particular person had one man married to all three women, with marriages overlapping, and having kids by all three.
If we want our research to be accepted and believed then we simply cannot ignore evidence that conflicts with what we believe to be true for our research subject. We must address it using the standards previously discussed, with evidence to support our conclusion, and then write it up. Sometimes, we cannot directly or even indirectly resolve the conflict and we must speak to it still being an open issue. Take for example one in my own family. The elder Gilshot Thomas (Circa 1730 – 1792) had a son, Gilshot Jr. (Circa 1752 – 1809). One of the two was arrested on a felony and transported to Savannah in 1787. No court records have been located to show the charge or which Gilshot was charged. Therefore any write-ups I might do would have to state that this conflict remains unresolved. Since it does not directly relate to any proof of relationships (that I know of) then this conflict does not require resolution at this time.
However, as in the case of Ambrose Watson, I had compelling evidence that Elijah was his father until something popped up that indicated otherwise. Upon further research, analysis and resolution, it was shown that Elijah was his brother, 21 years his senior. Sometimes we want something to be true so we overlook conflicts but we absolutely must thoroughly research the issue, analyze it, and resolve it. Particularly if it directly impacts establishing family relationships.
Without properly resolving conflicting evidence or information, all of our research is for naught as it can be easily picked apart by others. Some things, which seem so obvious to us, might look entirely different to someone else. I am reminded of a meme that has a large number painted on the ground. The person on one side looks at it and calls it a six, the person standing opposite calls it a nine. Without something to specifically indicate whether it is a 6 or 9 both are simply relying on a single perspective.
Do not shy away from such conflicts but look for clues to resolve them and commit them to paper, or computer files for others to use.